Why Atheists Like Dawkins and Hitchens Are Dead Wrong | Alternet

Why Atheists Like Dawkins and Hitchens Are Dead Wrong | Alternet
http://www.alternet.org/belief/why-atheists-dawkins-and-hitchens-are-dead-wrong?paging=off&current_page=1
Sent from Maxthon Cloud Browser
Jump to NavigationSEARCH:

Search form

SearchHOME CONTACT ADVERTISE DONATENEWS & POLITICSWORLDECONOMYRIGHTSENVIRONMENTMEDIA & CULTURELIVINGACTIVISMVISIONSEDUCATION  BELIEF  AlterNet / By Sana Saeed 754 COMMENTS

Why Atheists Like Dawkins and Hitchens Are Dead Wrong

Acolytes of Dawkins & Hitchens pretend that ignorant evangelicals represent all of religion. Here’s what they miss.754 COMMENTS754 COMMENTSdigg  A A AEmailPrintPhoto Credit: ollyy/Shutterstock.comApril 5, 2014  |      I’m supposed to hate science. Or so I’m told.I spent my childhood with my nose firmly placed between the pages of books on reptiles, dinosaurs, marine life and mammals. When I wasn’t busy wondering if I wanted to be more like Barbara Walters or Nancy Drew, I was busy digging holes in my parents’ backyard hoping to find lost bones of some great prehistoric mystery. I spent hours sifting through rocks that could possibly connect me to the past or, maybe, a hidden crystalline adventure inside. Potatoes were both  apart of a delicious dinner and batteries for those ‘I got this’ moments; magnets repelling one another were a sorcery I needed to, somehow, defeat. The greatest teachers I ever had were Miss Frizzle and Bill Nye the Science Guy.I also spent my childhood reciting verses from the Qur’an and a long prayer for everyone — in my family and the world — every night before going to bed. I spoke to my late grandfather, asking him to save me a spot in heaven. I went to the mosque and stepped on the shoes resting outside a prayer hall filled with worshippers. I tried fasting so I could be cool like my parents; played with prayer beads and always begged my mother to tell me more stories from the lives of the Abrahamic prophets.With age, my wonder with religion and science did not cease. Both were, to me, extraordinary portals into the life around me that left me constantly bewildered, breathless and amazed.Science would come to dominate my adolescent and early teenage years: papier mache cigarettes highlighting the most dangerous carcinogens, science fair projects on the virtues of chocolate consumption during menstruation; lamb lung and eye dissections, color coded notes, litmus tests on pretty papers, and disturbingly thorough study guides for five-question quizzes. My faith, too, remained operational in my day-to-day life: longer conversations with my late grandfather and all 30 Ramadan fasts, albeit with begrudging pre-dawn prayers. I attended Qur’anic recitation classes where I could not, for the life of me, recite anything that was not in English. I still read and listened to the stories of the prophets, with perhaps a greater sense of historical wonder and on occasion I would perform some of the daily prayers. Unsupervised access to the internet also led to the inevitable debates in Yahoo chat rooms about how Islam did not subjugate me as a woman. At the age of 16, I was busting out Quranic verses and references from the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad to shut up internet dwellers like Crusade563 and PopSmurf1967.It never once occurred to me during those years, and later, that there could be any sort of a conflict between my faith and science; to me both were part of the same things: This universe and my existence within it.And yet, here we are today being told that the two are irreconcilable; that religion begets an anti-science crusade and science pushes anti-religion valor. When did this become the only conversation on religion and science that we’re allowed to have?This current discourse that pits faith and science against one another like Nero’s lions versus Christians — inappropriate analogy intended — borrows directly from the conflation of all religious traditions with the history and experience of Euro-American Christianity, specifically of the evangelical variety.In my own religious tradition, Islam, there is a vibrant history of religion and science not just co-existing but informing one another intimately. Astrophysicists, chemists, biologists, alchemists, surgeons, psychologists, geographers, logicians, mathematicians– amongst so many others – would often function as theologians, saints, spiritual masters, jurists and poets as much as they would as scientists. Indeed, a quick survey of some of the most well known Muslim intellectuals of the past 1,400 years illustrates their masterful polymathy, their ability to reach across fields of expertise without blinking at any supposed “dissonance.” And, of course, this is not something exclusive to Islam; across the religious terrain we can find countless polymaths who delved into the worlds of God and science.Despite the history of the intellectual output of, well, the whole rest of the world, contemporary discussions in this country on the relationship between science and religion take religion to consist solely, again, of Euro-American Evangelical Christianity.  Thus “religious perspectives on human origins” are not really all that encompassing. Muslims, for instance, do not believe in Christian creationism and, actually, have differences on the nature of human origin. The Muslim creationism movement, headed by Turkish author and creationist activist Adnan Oktar (known popularly by the pseudonym Harun Yahya), is actually relatively recent and borrows much from Christian creationism – including even directly copied passages and arguments from anti-evolution Christian literature.The absence of a centralized religious clergy and authority in Sunni Islam allows for individual and scholarly theological negotiation – meaning that there is not, necessarily, a “right” answer embedded in Divine Truth to social and political questions. Some of the most influential and fundamental Islamic legal texts are filled with arguments and counter-arguments which all come from the same source (divine revelation), just different approaches to it.In other words: There’s plenty of wiggle room and then some. On anything that is not established as theological Truth (e.g. God’s existence, the finality of Prophethood, pillars and articles of faith), there is ample room for examination, debate and disagreement, because it does not undercut the fabric of faith itself.Muslims, generally, accept evolution as a fundamental part of the natural process; they differ, however, on human evolution – specifically the idea that humans and apes share an ancestor in common.  In the 13th century, Shi’i Persian polymath Nasir al-din al-Tusi discussed biological evolution in his book “Akhlaq-i-Nasri” (Nasirean Ethics). While al-Tusi’s theory of evolution differs from the one put forward by Charles Darwin 600 years later and the theory of evolution that we have today, he argued that the elemental source of all living things was one. From this single elemental source came four attributes of nature: water, air, soil and fire – all of which would evolve into different living species through hereditary variability. Hierarchy would emerge through differences in learning how to adapt and survive. Al-Tusi’s discussion on biological evolution and the relationship of synchronicity between animate and inanimate (how they emerge from the same source and work in tandem with one another) objects is stunning in its observational precision as well as its fusion with theistic considerations. Yet it is, at best, unacknowledged today in the Euro-centric conversation on religion and science. Why?My point here in this conversation about religion and science’s falsely created incommensurability isn’t about the existence of God – I would like to think that ultimately there is space for belief and disbelief. I would like to also believe, however, that the conversation on belief and disbelief can move beyond the Dawkinsean vitriol that disguises bigotry as a self-righteous claim to the sanctity of science; a claim that makes science the proudly held property of the Euro-American civilization and experience.Hoisted into popular culture by the Holy Trinity of Dawkins-Hitchens-Harris, New Atheism mirrors the very religious zealotry it claims is at the root of so much moral, political and social decay. In particular, these authors and their posse of followers have – as Nathan Lean characterized it in this publication back in March of last year – taken a particular penchant for “flirting with Islamophobia.” Instead of engaging with Islamic theology, New Atheists – the most prominent figurehead being Richard Dawkins – are more interested in ridiculing Muslims and Islam by employing the use of the same tired, racist talking points and images that situate Muslims in need of ‘enlightenment’ – or, salvation.The Evangelical Christian Right is a formidable force to be reckoned with in American national politics; there are legitimate fears by believing, non-believing and non-caring Americans that the course of the nation, from women’s rights to education, can and will be significantly set back because of the whims of loud and large group of citizens who refuse to acknowledge certain facts and changing realities and want the lives of all citizens to be subservient to their own will. This segment of the world’s religious topography, however, does not represent Religion or, in particular, Religion’s relationship with science.Religion is a vast historical experience between human communities, its individual parts, the environment and something Sacred that acts as that elemental glue between everything. Science and religion are not incommensurable – and it’s time we stop treating them like they are. Sana Saeed is a writer on politics with an interest in minority politics, media critique and religion in the public sphere. Follow her on Twitter@SanaSaeed.754 COMMENTS754 COMMENTSdigg See more stories tagged with: religion, science, richard dawkins, christopher hitchens, islam, evangelical christianityLIKED THIS ARTICLE?  JOIN OUR EMAIL LISTStay up to date with the latest headlines via emailby TaboolaSponsored ContentFrom the Web

10 Ways To Get the Car You Really WantSun Motors

Eat This, Never Diet Again! Learn How Here.Healthy Journal

9 Painfully Awkward People You Won’t Believe Actually ExistViralious

13 Symptoms of Bipolar Disorder: Are You Bipolar?Activebeat.com

13 Hot Celebrities with Shocking Body Deformities You Won’t BelieveAllwomenstalk.com

The Best football app ever made has landedSquawkaby TaboolaSponsored ContentRecommended

Eat This, Never Diet Again! Learn How Here. Healthy Journal

9 Painfully Awkward People You Won’t Believe Actually Exist Viralious

13 Symptoms of Bipolar Disorder: Are You Bipolar? Activebeat.com

13 Hot Celebrities with Shocking Body Deformities You Wo… Allwomenstalk.com

The Best football app ever made has landed Squawka

10 Things You Need to Know When Studying Abroad Alexander’s College

Wrap It Up: 5 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Have Children Inspiyr

5 Types of Bursaries Students Should Know About TARGETjobsYou might like:How Big Is the Average Penis? You Might Be Surprised (AlterNet)Doctor: Pubic Hair Exists for a Reason — Our Obsession With Hairless Genitals Must End! (AlterNet)9 Interesting Things You May Not Know About the Clitoris (AlterNet)How Jenny McCarthy’s Playboy Cover at 40 Hurts, Not Helps, Older Women (this site)Recommended by754 COMMENTS

8 Things Mainstream Media Doesn’t Have the Courage to Tell You

This Harrowing Tale of How Our Secret State Works to Crush Our Rights Will Chill You to the Bone

How Extreme Dog Breeding Has Brought Untold Suffering to ‘Man’s Best Friend’

7 Places PayPal Sends Your Personal Financial Info That You Probably Don’t Want It to Go

How Right-Wing Loons and Pro-Gun Nuts Blame Everything But Guns for Mass Shootings

Atheists Who Adopt: We’re Raising Our Seven Kids, Four Through Adoption, to be Freethinkers

Plankton, Fish Eyes and Scrapfish — the Menu of the Future?

How Do You Say No to Sex Without Hurting Your Partner’s Feelings?

Attention Drone Operators: You Could Be Killing This Child!

McCutcheon, the Majority, and the Challenge of Our Time

How a Shaman Helped Me Deal With My Deepest Insecurities and Severe Addiction

How War Hungry Pundits Get U.S. Foreign Policy Dead Wrong

Student Was Forced to Perform Sexual Acts in Her Dorm, Harvard Turned a Blind Eye

Best of the week

Most Read

5 Companies That Excel at Screwing Over Customers

Lynn Stuart Parramore /AlterNet

American Justice: A Rich Child Rapist Goes Free, But a Poor Woman Trying to Feed Her Kids is Jailed

Sadhbh Walshe / The Guardian

Christian Right Mega-Church Minister Faces Mega-Mutiny for Abusive Behavior

Valerie Tarico / AlterNet

Neil deGrasse Tyson Under Attack from Christians Who Want More Biblical Creationism on His Show

Amanda Marcotte / AlterNet

Noam Chomsky: The Dimming Prospects for Human Survival

Noam Chomsky / AlterNet

5 Things Conservatives Lie Shamelessly About

Amanda Marcotte / AlterNet

Intelligent People Are More Likely to Use Drugs. Why?

Sarah Bon / The Fix

Debunking the 5 Biggest Myths About Pot

Owen Poindexter / AlterNet

Why Atheists Like Dawkins and Hitchens Are Dead Wrong

Sana Saeed / AlterNet

Women Who Have Rough Sex: Why It Can Be Liberating

Anna Pulley / AlterNet

AlterNet Comics: Jen Sorensen on the McCutcheon Disaster

Is the Internet Killing Religion?

Attention Drone Operators: You Could Be Killing This Child!

See your ad here!blog advertising is good for you.

Speakeasy

Police Harassed Me, Ran Me Out of Town Because of My Cannabis ActivismSusan Soares “If you are such a loser that you feel a need to carry a gun with you when you go out, I do not want your business.”Martha Rosenberg Battle of the Billboards: “Christian Taliban” vs. Constitution at Air Force AcademyMikey Weinstein Is there Finally Hope for Challenging Orientalism in Hollywood?Tikkun Daily Is Racism Playing a Role in the Religious Right’s Hostility to Neil deGrasse Tyson?Chauncey DeVega The “Billionaire’s Primary”: Meet America’s New Political BossesTerrance Heath Administrators Tell College Athletes: Don’t Worry, Be HappyLeo Gerard Are SC legislators harming state universities on behalf on anti-gay groups?alvinmcewen moreNews & PoliticsWorldEconomyRightsCIVIL LIBERTIESGENDERIMMIGRATIONEnvironmentENVIRONMENTFOODFRACKINGWATERMedia & CultureBOOKSCULTUREMEDIASUMMITS ON TENTHLivingBELIEFDRUGSFOODPERSONAL HEALTHSEX & RELATIONSHIPSActivismVisionsEducationWHO WE AREABOUT IMIOUR FOUNDATIONSPRESS INFORMATIONWRITER GUIDELINESPRIVACY POLICYADVERTISE ON ALTERNETCONTACT USDONATEMOBILELOGIN

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s